Civil protection authorities have said that most of the fires were due to negligence, but added that arson was suspected in a number of cases. In Greece and Italy, officials have blamed some fires on arson motivated by attempts to clear land for development. In Spain, there are also suspicions of arson. But soaring temperatures from the region's second heat wave in as many months has also contributed to the fires by leaving vast swathes of the region parched.
The forest fires are affected by the degree of management that forests receive, and in this respect Family Forest Owners can play an instrumental role in forest fire prevention. When sylviculture is neglected, there is a danger of highly inflammable fuels building up within the forest.
Private forest owners are the main people affected by forest fires and natural catastrophes, often resulting in considerable loss of income. The affected wood loses its value as timber, and there are the extra costs of the harvesting of burnt trees to be considered. Once urgent restoration works are completed, there is also the question of the rehabilitation of damaged areas. To all this, one must also add the cost of reforestation. By law, for example the legislation existing in Portugal and in Spain, reforestation is mandatory. It can also be essential for reasons of soil stability or desertification.
In the south of Europe private forest property is divided between more than two million proprietors who handle 70% of the forest space. In most regions of southern Europe one in four families owns forest property. Family forests are a powerful forest chain that generates a very significant part of revenue in this southern region. Private foresters utilise their resources to plan and to execute infrastructures - routes, water tanks – and they manage the forest to help prevent forest fires. These responsibilities are not widely known about, and therefore are not valued by society.
The official information on forest fires from member states and the European Commission do not have or cannot provide data relative to the type and number of private forest owners whose forests have been affected by fires; or the characteristics of these forests. The estimation of value of forest products destroyed or the depreciation of burned wood is equally not known. There is equally no data estimating - the costs of restoration of forests, the losses from destroyed facilities or damaged infrastructures. This lack of data demonstrates a neglect of the human and socioeconomic component of forest fires.
The full effects of fires on private forests are not yet known. It is urgent to incorporate all aspects of forest fires into the official data especially in data relative to affected private forest owners (e.g. at the European Forest Fire Information System - EFFIS). At the same time forests must have sufficient infrastructures of fire defence and sufficient means to cover related expenses. It should be seen as a European and national policy priority to create a strategy for forest fire defence, based on prevention.
Most countries have a highly professional forest fire service. Governments dedicate important resources to fire extinction but they must also allocate resources to preventive measures, and consider that one does not replace the other.
The forestry sector needs to improve and diversify their industry to increase the income of private forest owners to be able to guarantee forest biodiversity and sustainability. Profitability of biomass extraction for the owner is key to reducing forest fires. The present European and national regulations do not offer measures adapted for catastrophes or prevention of fire in the forests of southern Europe. Family Forest Owners in the South are committed to reducing Forest Fires, but need the right political support in order to do so.